9-bits by David Kaneda

A tumblog by David Kaneda, creative director at Sencha.


POWERED by FUSION

May 11th 2010

The material that’s the most important for the users’ goals or your business goals should be above the fold. Users do look below the fold, but not nearly as much as they look above the fold.

Jakob Nielsen, Scrolling and Attention

I’ve thought the same many times, especially when I come across sites like this and this that encourage people to disregard the fold entirely.

Create too many paths and your site turns into a maze.
David Yeiser, Managing Clutter
Chris Messina has posted a variety of concepts for Mozilla he did for Mozilla last year — all of which are a great study in user experience.

Working with the team, I produced a series of mockups and written pieces that were designed to first layout a future scenario for what I call “pop computing” — an era when computing is cheap, facile, and a part of the everyday environment.

Chris Messina has posted a variety of concepts for Mozilla he did for Mozilla last year — all of which are a great study in user experience.

Working with the team, I produced a series of mockups and written pieces that were designed to first layout a future scenario for what I call “pop computing” — an era when computing is cheap, facile, and a part of the everyday environment.

Luke Wroblewski wrote an article yesterday titled, “Mad Libs” Style Form Increases Conversion 25-40%. The post was about a team, led by Ron Kurti, redesigning a form for Vast.com. By no means do I intend to knock the success of the redesign, but part of me wonders if the conclusion was rushed. In addition to using a narrative user flow, he’s also:
Lessened form inputs, added placeholder text, and made one optional
Removed distracting links throughout
Highlighting contextual information like the car being negotiated
Made the submit button bigger
Added icons
Said “Thank you”
Luke mentions the possibility of other factors affecting the result in his review, but I think it may be an understatement. Sometimes conversion rates can be massively improved by a minor change to a design or user flow. While A/B testing can be very useful, keep in mind that it is still a science and comprehensively reviewing constants and variables is a big part of that science.

Luke Wroblewski wrote an article yesterday titled, “Mad Libs” Style Form Increases Conversion 25-40%. The post was about a team, led by Ron Kurti, redesigning a form for Vast.com. By no means do I intend to knock the success of the redesign, but part of me wonders if the conclusion was rushed. In addition to using a narrative user flow, he’s also:

  • Lessened form inputs, added placeholder text, and made one optional
  • Removed distracting links throughout
  • Highlighting contextual information like the car being negotiated
  • Made the submit button bigger
  • Added icons
  • Said “Thank you”

Luke mentions the possibility of other factors affecting the result in his review, but I think it may be an understatement. Sometimes conversion rates can be massively improved by a minor change to a design or user flow. While A/B testing can be very useful, keep in mind that it is still a science and comprehensively reviewing constants and variables is a big part of that science.

Also noted: