POWERED by FUSION

August 31st 2010

I Want a Stupid 7-inch iPad »

Lance Ulanoff thinks The 7-inch Apple iPad is a Stupid Idea:

Kidding aside, I have not heard one good argument for the existence of this device. What’s more worrisome to me is that some companies like Samsung appear to be carving out this space as if 7-inch tablets are the “new black.” Why are they doing this? Was there some consumer outcry for a 7-inch device that I missed?

The rumor of a smaller iPad has been floating around for the past couple days and I have to say, I’m psyched. Honestly, the first thing that came to mind when on that glorious Saturday when the iPad arrived was, “Huh, bigger than I imagined.” Why? For me, it’s all about the keyboard. In its current state, the iPad keyboard is oafish in landscape orientation. It’s simply too big to be comfortably used as a soft keyboard. Portrait mode is even worse: Stretching your thumbs to hit keys like “T” and “Y”, all while delicately cradling your iPad in a near top-heavy manor. At 7 inches, a smaller iPad would be far more comfortable to type on, in either situation. A smaller iPad would also be easier to store, easier to carry, and less intrusive in places like restaurants.

So, then, what’s to lose? I don’t want to make a career out of analyzing screen resolution, but think about this: If you upped the pixel density on a 7-inch iPad (132ppi) to that of a non-Retina iPhone (163 ppi), you get almost the exact same number of pixels. Put it this way: You could double the number of pixels on the current iPad, and still comfortably fit them in a Retina-display, 7-inch iPad. The current iPad’s battery, which constitutes the bulk of it’s weight/size, also lasts much longer than I need. With a smaller display, the loss of any battery space would go unnoticed.

Perhaps there was no consumer outcry for a 7-inch tablet, and no, being a little smaller won’t make the thing any more magical — but Apple doesn’t make products just because people ask for them. Instead, Apple tries to deliver on what you don’t know you need. In this case, a more portable, more usable device. It’s not an addition to the iPad line, it’s what the iPad was supposed to be. I can’t wait for the stupid thing.

These screenshots compare the Where To? 1.0 design (released on day one of the App Store) and an Apple patent submitted in December 2009. FutureTap describes their concern in a recent blog post:


  I’m not a lawyer. I can’t really judge whether the inclusion of a 1:1 copy of our start screen in someone else’s patent is legal. I just have to say, it doesn’t feel right.

These screenshots compare the Where To? 1.0 design (released on day one of the App Store) and an Apple patent submitted in December 2009. FutureTap describes their concern in a recent blog post:

I’m not a lawyer. I can’t really judge whether the inclusion of a 1:1 copy of our start screen in someone else’s patent is legal. I just have to say, it doesn’t feel right.

I buy things that are great today. They’re usually things that have been great since day one. And, more often than not, they’re Apple products.
Marco Arment, Great since day one

Possible escapes from the mobile SDKs' clutches - InfoWorld »

The mobile browser may provide an answer. Browser support for extended features of mobile devices, such as the iPhone, iPad, and Android smartphones, is starting to be good — very good, indeed. Two recent projects illustrate what can be done beyond what’s already built into WebKit for mobile devices.

Spoiler alert: The two projects are jQTouch and Sencha Touch.

Get Your eBook in the Apple iBookstore »

Authors can submit their works to Lulu, have them converted to the proper ePub format, and earn from their sales, without hassle. This type of eased self-publishing, combined with a wide distribution channel, could have big implications for the publishing industry, especially novice authors. I’m eager to see how this pans out.

Someone has it backwards — it is HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and H.264 (all supported by the iPhone and iPad) that are open and standard, while Adobe’s Flash is closed and proprietary.
Trudy Miller, Apple spokeswoman
We are at the beginning of a significant change in the industry, and I believe that ultimately open platforms will win out over the type of closed, locked down platform that Apple is trying to create.

Gizmodo has its hands on what appears to be the pending 4th generation iPhone. Usual skepticism aside, this looks very real, and is probably either an intentional “drop” on Apple’s part, or their biggest security blunder to date. Either way, it looks fantastic.

Also noted: